[Bug 10217] New: Xflock4 doesn't knows about actual lockers

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
65 messages Options
1234
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

review granted: [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers : [Attachment 7218] xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

bugzilla-daemon
Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> has granted  review:
Bug 10217: Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217

Attachment 7218: xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7218&action=edit



--- Comment #60 from Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 7218
  --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7218&action=edit
xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

command_dpms implemented as a shell function.
_______________________________________________
Xfce-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

review granted: [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers : [Attachment 7219] xflock4 that works also with an older version of light-locker.

bugzilla-daemon
In reply to this post by bugzilla-daemon
Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> has granted  review:
Bug 10217: Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217

Attachment 7219: xflock4 that works also with an older version of light-locker.
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7219&action=edit



--- Comment #61 from Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 7219
  --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7219&action=edit
xflock4 that works also with an older version of light-locker.

Work also, if the xfconf property is unset or whitespace.
_______________________________________________
Xfce-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

review granted: [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers : [Attachment 7220] xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

bugzilla-daemon
In reply to this post by bugzilla-daemon
Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> has granted  review:
Bug 10217: Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217

Attachment 7220: xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7220&action=edit



--- Comment #62 from Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 7220
  --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7220&action=edit
xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

Work also, if the xfconf property is unset or whitespace.
_______________________________________________
Xfce-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

review granted: [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers : [Attachment 7247] xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

bugzilla-daemon
In reply to this post by bugzilla-daemon
Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> has granted  review:
Bug 10217: Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217

Attachment 7247: xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7247&action=edit



--- Comment #64 from Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 7247
  --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7247&action=edit
xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

Not using floating point arguments for sleep for POSIX compatibility.

First, use a running screensaver for locking, if detected.

Added a couple more xfconf variables
LockSetDPMS tells, if the script should change DPMS setting with custom lock
command.
LockWaitComplete tells, if the script should wait until the custom command
finishes before exiting the script; use 'true' with lockers that fork. If
'false', wait one second at most.
If LockCommand is empty or undefined, or if it fails to run, fall back to
predefined lockers.
_______________________________________________
Xfce-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

review granted: [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers : [Attachment 7254] xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

bugzilla-daemon
In reply to this post by bugzilla-daemon
Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> has granted  review:
Bug 10217: Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217

Attachment 7254: xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7254&action=edit



--- Comment #65 from Jarno Suni <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 7254
  --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7254&action=edit
xflock4 for new light-locker that supports --query option

Use "sleep 0.1" if system supports it. By sleep it does not use system
resources that much.
_______________________________________________
Xfce-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
1234
Loading...